You are informed
Visitor Number
Last update 09/06/05
ISSUES
LINKS
(ARCHIVE)
Eight ways to
by environmentalist
Governor Dick Lamm
ADVERSARY OF: Corrupt Politicians, Illegal immigration, ACLU, Socialists & Communists
THIS SITE IS STRONGLY AGAINST ANY KIND OF RACISM, ANTI-SEMITISM, HATE, TERROR, RELIGIOUS FANATICISM, OR MILITANT ACTIVITIES
My oath of American citizenship promised that I will fight against enemies from within and without. I served my country overseas over a half a century ago, but today I'm fighting against racism, hatred, anti-American hostility, and anti- American political agendas right here in America! I am the Watchdog and I report to YOU -- Hal Netkin
www.WatchdogAmerica.com
Hal Netkin
Immigration Activist
Returning Veteran
Animal Rights
Activist
These people are
extremists who are
potential terrorists
IF I WERE A TERRORIST -- THE PLAN
In order to create panic and fear, I will terrorize Los Angeles with the objective of murdering hundreds or thousands of Americans including children. More...
The clown that runs the Department of Homeland Security says "the system worked"
Janet Napolitano
Secretary of DHS
Isaac Yeffet
Security Expert
Issac Yeffet, former Head of El Al Airlines and retired member of Israel Secret Police, Explains why El Al is the safest airline in the world. Watch Video ...
| ||||
Report: Is the Southern Border Secure? You Decide!
September 2010
Everything you ever wanted know about border fences but were afraid to ask. Click here for More...
Updated
April 2009
Why the Obama administration isn't enforcing immigration law and not securing the border -- An unthinkable prediction by Hal Netkin. More.....
DOJ Dismisses Black Panther Voter Intimidation Case
Philidelphia 2008
Whistle blower: DOJ practices reverse racism.
(posted 07/02/10).......Watch
Second Whistle blower confirms that DOJ practices reverse racism (posted 09/26/10).......Watch
Posted October 30, 2010
Harry Reid's
MOTHER OF ALL FLIP FLOPS
On illegal Immigration
Harry Reid on Illegal Immigration
Posted November 25, 2010
Talk show host Neil Boortz slams Muslim
No Muslim Outrage Listen...
Posted January 02, 2011
John Clapper
Director of National Intellegence
John Brennan
Deputy National
Security Advisor
Janet Napolitano
Secretary of
Homeland Security
Diane Sawyer interviews The Three National Security Stooges
Posted May 12, 2011
Sharia in America
David Wood explains how our government ingratiates with Muslims.
December 2011
Exponential Population Growth and
how the U.S. and the World will end (up).
WHERE WE'RE HEADED, -- by Hal Netkin
The objectives of Environmentalists to purify and recycle the planet's resources are meaningless unless zero population growth is at the top of their list.
The most noted environmental group, the Sierra Club, had in its earlier years put zero population growth as its main goal. But the Sierra Club has caved in to political correctness driven by money on the issue of immigration. They no longer oppose massive immigration (legal or illegal).
The U.S. Census Bureau says that the current annual rate of growth in the U.S. is 0.9 percent which is expected to rise. But using the current growth rate, the U.S. population which is now at 312,838,706 will double in only 78 years to 625,677,412.
Most of the U.S. growth rate is driven by massive immigration mostly by uneducated non-White Hispanics who have the highest fertility rate which may even increase the population growth rate from its current level 0.9 percent. If the U.S. survives nuclear war our troubles won't be over. Immigration will do us in.
Some pro-immigration advocates point to the vast open areas that one sees when peering out of a coast to coast airliner's window as ample space to accommodate high immigration levels for years to come.
But sufficient space isn't the only requirement to enable the addition of millions more to our population -- although exponential population growth will ultimately cause the the U.S. to run out of living space.
The fate of the future of our planet can be determined easily with simple arithmetic. Even so, virtually all of our elected politicians either haven't got a clue about where we are heading and most are willing to sacrifice the future of America for votes. To understand this, please watch this streaming video presentation, Arithmetic, Population and Energy by Dr. Albert Bartlett.
Please also watch this Related video: It's the numbers stupid.
March 2012
UNDERSTANDING
By Hal Netkin -- In 1996, congress authorized the "Basic Pilot" program. Employers who voluntarily signed up for the program could go on-line to verify a worker's legal right to work in the U.S. In 2006 after a successful ten year run, the program's name was changed from the Basic Pilot to E-Verify. Nevertheless, employers' use of E-Verify remains optional. But there is a House bill authored by Representative Lamar Smith pending which would make E-Verify mandatory on a federal level.
Of course those who oppose immigration enforcement like the ACLU come up with bogus excuses as to why NOT to pass Lamar's bill.
Ironically, some immigration enforcement advocates are also opposed to Lamar's bill because it contains a preemption clause that limits states from doing their own immigration enforcement. Based on the fed's history of NOT enforcing immigration law, many believe that E-Verify won't be enforced at all.
On the other hand, leaving immigration enforcement up to the states may not be a good thing. For example, states with the highest concentration of illegal aliens such as California and New York won't enforce immigration laws at all -- preemption or not.
Here's the bottom line: If President Obama gets reelected, all bets on E-Verify are off. But if Mitt Romney is elected and keeps his promise, there is a good chance that E-Verify will be enforced.
V-Dare.com has published Hal Netkin's opinion piece on the subject. You can read about it here.
April 2012
America Live with Megyn Kelly
SB 1070 Heard April 25, 2012 at US Supreme Court
Cautious Optimism For Arizona
COURT EXCERPTS and COMMENTS
The court spent the bulk of its time on SB 1070's Section 2, which includes the requirement that law enforcement check an individual's legal status in certain situations during a (lawful) stop, detainment or arrest.
Solicitor General Donald Verrilli argued that Arizona can't enforce this and other parts of SB 1070 because federal immigration law is the authority of the federal government alone. Verrilli said SB 1070 "maximizes the apprehension of unlawful aliens" and conflicts with federal priorities. But justices seemed skeptical and, at times, highly critical of Verrilli's argument.
Justice Antonin Scalia: "The state has no power to close its borders to people who have no right to be there? What does sovereignty mean if it does not include the ability to secure your own borders? Arizona is not trying to kick out somebody the federal government has not said does not belong here."
Chief Justice John Roberts: "I don't see the problem, This is not an effort to enforce federal law. It's an effort to tell you about violations of federal law. It seems to me the federal government just doesn't want to know who is here illegally."
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer, considered two of the court's more liberal justices, seemed to have a mixed opinion on this portion of the law. Both appeared concerned that it may lead to authorities detaining individuals longer while determining their immigration status, but they did not seem concerned with requiring local law enforcement to question individuals about their legal status.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor (not buying Verrilli's arguement): "Come up with something else,"
Verrilli: "allowing this part of the law to go into effect will lead to "mass incarceration of illegal immigrants."
Justice Antonin Scalia (countered): "Solve the problem of mass incarceration by simply deporting these people."
Verrilli: "allowing Arizona to question and incarcerate illegal immigrants raises significant foreign-relations issues."
Justice Antonin Scalia (dismissing Verrilli's arguement): "We have to enforce our laws in a manner that will please Mexico?"
Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano tell me the Arizona immigration law is unconstitutional and the worst law they never read.
But not to worry, even if the courts find SB1070 to be constitutional, my buddy John Morton will NOT cooperate with Arizona.
BUENO!
California Representative Tom McClintock has something to say to Mexico's Felipe Calderon. Watch Video
Allan Wall explains Mexico's immigration laws. Watch Video
Barack Obama and Felipe Calderon conspiring to undermine Arizona's immigration law
Posted May 06, 2012
Danish commentator shows how President Obama insincerely ingratiates (kisses butt) with foreign country politicians.
